<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The problem with big displays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/general/the-problem-with-big-displays/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/general/the-problem-with-big-displays</link>
	<description>because it is!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:45:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyt</title>
		<link>http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/general/the-problem-with-big-displays/comment-page-1#comment-3775</link>
		<dc:creator>kyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/?p=498#comment-3775</guid>
		<description>I know, this is older BUT, I use my dad&#039;s BIG lcd monitor all the time and have no issues whatsoever using all that space, but then again its on Mac and not a MS PC! I often have 2 windows open, a chat up and am programming away on one window while I research or view the results on another window. I don&#039;t the issues of buttons too far apart, or all this white space. Simply resize the browser  window, or the application window you are working on. IN the case of silly programs that insist on using full screen, well, I do avoid those as I think the programmar a bit silly to insist that I only do his application exclusively. I can multi-task unlike most CEO&#039;s who insist on making their apps only full screen. 

Would I use a double monitor? Sure! Matter of a fact, if I could get 2 24&quot; flat screens to work side by side, I would do it in a heart beat. I&#039;d even buy a 30&quot;, if they were a little cheaper. 

Signed, female quadruple tasker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, this is older BUT, I use my dad&#8217;s BIG lcd monitor all the time and have no issues whatsoever using all that space, but then again its on Mac and not a MS PC! I often have 2 windows open, a chat up and am programming away on one window while I research or view the results on another window. I don&#8217;t the issues of buttons too far apart, or all this white space. Simply resize the browser  window, or the application window you are working on. IN the case of silly programs that insist on using full screen, well, I do avoid those as I think the programmar a bit silly to insist that I only do his application exclusively. I can multi-task unlike most CEO&#8217;s who insist on making their apps only full screen. </p>
<p>Would I use a double monitor? Sure! Matter of a fact, if I could get 2 24&#8243; flat screens to work side by side, I would do it in a heart beat. I&#8217;d even buy a 30&#8243;, if they were a little cheaper. </p>
<p>Signed, female quadruple tasker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brant Peery</title>
		<link>http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/general/the-problem-with-big-displays/comment-page-1#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Brant Peery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/?p=498#comment-219</guid>
		<description>A problem with bigger displays is that while it may seem like more space to the user, it really isn&#039;t any more space than that of a small display. So a windows manager will not help give more pixels so that the physical space can be used more effectively. The user has to turn their head to see each side of the screen on a 30&quot; monitor. Yet they gain nothing in actual screen real estate. 
The only real answer is dual, quad... setups. Where each monitor is a reasonable size and their resolution capable of something that gives high value screen real estate. That way the user doesn&#039;t just get something presented to them BIGGER, but MORE can be shown to the user. I see monitor screens coming out that have 2, 4, 6... individual LCD screens built into one monitor casing. So it looks like a 30&quot; single monitor, but has a resolution of a 2x2 array of monitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A problem with bigger displays is that while it may seem like more space to the user, it really isn&#8217;t any more space than that of a small display. So a windows manager will not help give more pixels so that the physical space can be used more effectively. The user has to turn their head to see each side of the screen on a 30&#8243; monitor. Yet they gain nothing in actual screen real estate.<br />
The only real answer is dual, quad&#8230; setups. Where each monitor is a reasonable size and their resolution capable of something that gives high value screen real estate. That way the user doesn&#8217;t just get something presented to them BIGGER, but MORE can be shown to the user. I see monitor screens coming out that have 2, 4, 6&#8230; individual LCD screens built into one monitor casing. So it looks like a 30&#8243; single monitor, but has a resolution of a 2&#215;2 array of monitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuno costa</title>
		<link>http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/general/the-problem-with-big-displays/comment-page-1#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>nuno costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/?p=498#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Hi Pedro,

Welcome here!

You are correct, but as I said it&#039;s not quite the same thing!

It&#039;s better to solve this with a new UI paradigm than hopping the users start using a specific  window manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pedro,</p>
<p>Welcome here!</p>
<p>You are correct, but as I said it&#8217;s not quite the same thing!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s better to solve this with a new UI paradigm than hopping the users start using a specific  window manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/general/the-problem-with-big-displays/comment-page-1#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francodacosta.com/blog/?p=498#comment-161</guid>
		<description>They already think of a solution many years ago, it just haven&#039;t reached the big main stream audience.
It&#039;s called: Tiling window manager

cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They already think of a solution many years ago, it just haven&#8217;t reached the big main stream audience.<br />
It&#8217;s called: Tiling window manager</p>
<p>cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
